Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I will bother you kind W-body folks one last time today. The time will soon arrive for me to replace the 225/60/16 Regul 80K mile tires I've got on my '93 Cutlass Supreme S. The 16" rims on it I got right after I bought the car (it needed new tires then, anyway). In the next 15K or so I'll have to get another set of tires. Might it be better for me (as far as 0-60 times) to go back to the 15" steel rims and get a set of low(er) profile tires to reduce the tire diameter and make it easier to turn? Would this result in a fuel efficency decrease/increase? Any thoughts?

Posted

If the rims and tires are bigger than what you had stock, then you will loose some tq. Id imagine for better times youd want to go back to the stock wheels, or smaller if you want. Unless you want to shell out some serious cash for some super light wieght 16 or 17" rims.

Posted

essentially going smaller would bring your RPM's up so decreased mileage would result. but if the wheel is lighter the rotational mass would be less resulting in increased or same mileage.

Posted

You are also completely throwing your speedometer's accuracey right out the window. If you want to save a bit of gas, go with a narrower tire.......less rolling resistance and a bit more aerodynamic.

 

If you want to use those 15s.........215/70/15 is about the closest you can get to the stock overall height.

 

If you want better 60' times either get better (NOT shorter) tires or make power!

Posted

actually stock size is 205-70-15 OR you can run 215-65-15 and your speedo will be off around 2.7% which isn't anything to quack at anyway. I personally think the latter size looks pretty damn good on the 15"ers

Posted

I never claimed the speedo would be FAST, but thanky for stating that. And anyone putting 215-70-15 is out of their freaking mind, that tire is too tall.

Posted

My custom Regal came stock with 205/70/14 tires and wheels. Now those 14's will give you your added rpms. Never having extra cash, I still have stock 14" wheels but with 225/70/14 tires giving me about the same circumference as 225/60/16's. You'd think that would be a size short but trust me, any bigger will rub.

 

Any older plain Lumina or Regal has 14's. About 93 or 94 went to 15's

Posted

What do you mean to tall? 215/70/15 is actually 0.3" SHORTER than 225/60/16.

Posted

YEAH!!! AND the rim is 15 inch vs 16 inch!!! I said the TIRE IS TALL. TALL SIDE WALLS!!

Posted

You are no longer watching this topic

 

Click Here to return to the topic

Posted

So? Its not like 225/60/16s have a short sidewall. And who cares? The is the MOST accurate the speedometer can get.

Posted

[hijack]

 

Are 225/60/16's the stock tire size for the 16" Euro rims? when I bought mine they came with 215/60/16's.

 

[/hijack]

 

- Justin

Posted
Might it be better for me (as far as 0-60 times) to go back to the 15" steel rims and get a set of low(er) profile tires to reduce the tire diameter and make it easier to turn?

 

When going to a smaller circumference, the engine has to work harder to get the car up to speed. Harder working engine equals decreased lifespan of the engine.

Posted

smaller tire size will give you a little quicker of the line, but you will lose a little top speed because of it. give and take either way.

Posted

225/60/16 is the stock size for the euro rim. 70 series tires tend to roll onto the sidewalls if you push them hard.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...