Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently went for a set of 225-60-16 (radial) tires as recommended by Tire Rack for my 2 door 3.1 1996 Supreme with 16 inch wheels. After the purchase I checked the manual the manual which listed 215's as the recommended size. I don't think this makes all that much difference, would anyone disagree? There's no wheel-well rub but I do note they are barely contained within the wheel well itself. Mud Flaps are planned to be installed.

 

Does anyone think this might be too much tire for this car?

 

Thanks

Posted

My car came with stock 5 spokes with 225/60/16 tires from the factory, so you're right on target.

Posted

I'm not sure why the manual recommends that. 225/60/R16 was the defacto tire size for GM's midsize and full size FWD cars in the 90's and 2000's. That's what I had on my Cutlass when I bought it and it fit fine. No rubbing or other issues. 

Posted

Agreed, I've got the 5 spoke version and I agree these are just fine. I also believe these 5 spoke wheels were among the nicest looking wheels GM ever offered in any GM division at any time. Really glad Olds got them.

Posted (edited)

My car was 205/70/15, I run a 225/60/16 on 1991GTP X-Laces. At full turn they rub the fender liner in the front so I just don't do it.

Edited by Imp558
Posted

215 is for the base 16" rim while the optional 5 spook wheels got 225

Posted

Makes total sense, thanks. I just got the new style Uniroyal Tiger Paw Touring that just came out (?), they seem to be ok so far. Mine is the FE-1 ride with the 5 spoke wheels.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...