RobertISaar Posted March 11, 2011 Report Posted March 11, 2011 that is epic LULZ. and are those the "updated" ratings, or the original ones from the early 90s? Quote
White93z34 Posted March 11, 2011 Report Posted March 11, 2011 I think that is the most current information. Guy I knew had one once, it was not *that* painfully slow but it sure made a lot or racket and got pretty bad fuel economy. Quote
RobertISaar Posted March 11, 2011 Report Posted March 11, 2011 i did a quick comparo... 1992 duke lumi w/3 speed: 18/26 with new ratings, 21/28 original 1993 2.2 lumi w/3 speed: 18/26 with new ratings, 21/29 original 1993 3.1 lumi w/3 speed: 17/25 with new ratings, 19/27 original 1993 3.1 lumi w/4 speed: 17/27 with new ratings, 19/30 original Quote
LuminaPower92 Posted March 14, 2011 Report Posted March 14, 2011 Dont they got problems with plastic gears or something too? Quote
slick Posted March 14, 2011 Report Posted March 14, 2011 I would totally buy one if one came up for sale locally. Quote
threepointone Posted March 14, 2011 Author Report Posted March 14, 2011 the cam gear loses a tooth but its repairable with a new gear which should be heated in hot oil to install it back on the shaft im good with dukes thats why im trying to find me a duke lumina Quote
threepointone Posted March 14, 2011 Author Report Posted March 14, 2011 i had a chance to get a burgundy 91' duke lumina but it was rotted at the trailing arms so i passed on it Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.