wickedbuick Posted June 28, 2010 Report Posted June 28, 2010 (edited) I don't know if there are any PCM differences since there would be the OBD1/2 difference but hoping I can swap it into my olds and be done with it. Does anyone know if this will fit or will the PCM need to be tuned for that trans? Any other changes that would make it not work? Edited June 28, 2010 by wickedbuick Quote
AL Posted June 28, 2010 Report Posted June 28, 2010 There are a few external differences but very minor internal differences, not enough to make a difference tho... I asked Ken about it a while ago Quote
Jonpro03 Posted June 28, 2010 Report Posted June 28, 2010 If it helps, Im running a '94 4t60e behind a '02 3100 in a '96 gp. Quote
RobertISaar Posted June 28, 2010 Report Posted June 28, 2010 the 93 would have a TCC accumulator(old way of softing the TCC apply, rather than through electronics), so you'd get a softer TCC apply than expected.... other than that, the trans plug may be wired differently, but it will definitely work without issue, assuming the VSS reluctor is the same. Quote
wickedbuick Posted June 29, 2010 Author Report Posted June 29, 2010 Thats what I figured. I was really only worried about the wiring for it not being the same. Does anyone know if the plugs are different between the years? Quote
RobertISaar Posted June 29, 2010 Report Posted June 29, 2010 if they are different, then i could get you the diagrams to correct it... Quote
wickedbuick Posted June 29, 2010 Author Report Posted June 29, 2010 if they are different, then i could get you the diagrams to correct it... Ok thanks Rob. I'll let you know if there are any differences I am getting the trans this week but don't think I'll be working on it till I get my Regal off jackstands. Hopefully thats next weekend lol Quote
Crazy K Posted June 29, 2010 Report Posted June 29, 2010 (edited) physical fit = yes wiring is different. I think you also have an issue with the fact that OBD 2 needs the temp sensor. trying to find interchange right now. Edited June 29, 2010 by Crazy K Quote
Crazy K Posted June 29, 2010 Report Posted June 29, 2010 PBWM13 4T60E Cutlass 94-96 Supreme, 6-207 (3.4L), 3.43 ratio Grand Prix 94-96 6-207 (3.4L), 3.43 ratio Lumina car 94-96 6-207 (3.4L), 3.43 ratio Monte Carlo 95-96 6-207 (3.4L), 3.43 ratio I am still trying to find out more.... Quote
Galaxie500XL Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 I'm not absolutely sure about this, but I thought that starting in '94, the side pan was changed (not sure of proper term) to a cast aluminum housing, so that they could bolt a mount directly to the pan. That's why it's such a PITA to change the shift solenoid and PWM solenoid on my '95 Cutlass. Am I remembering this wrong? Can the pan simply be swapped onto the older transmission? Quote
Crazy K Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 I'm not absolutely sure about this, but I thought that starting in '94, the side pan was changed (not sure of proper term) to a cast aluminum housing, so that they could bolt a mount directly to the pan. That's why it's such a PITA to change the shift solenoid and PWM solenoid on my '95 Cutlass. Am I remembering this wrong? Can the pan simply be swapped onto the older transmission? 91-93 4t60e trannys have a "homemade" brace added that use the conventional bosses to locate the mount used specifically in W-bodies. I think it will work as long as the internal wiring and selonoids are changed. Quote
jtwmechanic Posted July 1, 2010 Report Posted July 1, 2010 why do you want to use the older style tranny? Quote
wickedbuick Posted July 2, 2010 Author Report Posted July 2, 2010 why do you want to use the older style tranny? Because of the above reason and cause I couldn't find an exact match on here or local last time I looked. If some one has one I'll possibly sell this one I'm getting from Alex and it. Otherwise its this route for now. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.