Jonathan_C Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 So the transmission in my 1993 z34 lq1/4t60e went out. Completely, no chance at an affordable rebuild. Due to financial concerns my only recourse was to locate a replacement. I did a search on some site that looked through junkyard databases and bought what I was led to believe a transmission from a 1993 lq1 powered lumina. Upon my arrival at home, which is 3 hrs from the boneyard, I look at the invoice and it said in comments, 3.1 red lumina. I called the boneyard to ask exactly which car the trans came from, but they havent responded yet, and I am not certain they ever will be able to ascertain the origins of the transmission. It is my best knowledge the 3.1 4t60e from 1993 had 3.33 final drive and I believe the z34 came with a 3.06? I'm not positive on this, if I'm wrong - feel free to correct me. So... short of pulling the trans apart to identify it, is there anyway to determine the final drive by the coding on the tag? Also, what's best and worst case scenario for the install if the gearing is a little low - or high, whatever the case is. I know it WILL bolt up to the lq1, but will it play nice? If I can identify the transmission final drive then perhaps I can get some sort of refund. If it will work 99% good being out of a 3.1 I might do that as well. I figure you guys are smarter than me, so what should I do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy K Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 ON THE REAR OF THE CASE IS A TAG AND A STAMPED NUMBER. THE TAG IS TOWARDS THE RIGHT SIDE. THE STAMPED NUMBER IS ON A FLANGE RIGHT ABOVE THE PAN. GET BOTH AND POST ASAP. 3.4= 3.43 FDR 3.1= 3.33 FDR FYI You CAN use that transmission in your car(since you are OBD 1), but you'd overdrive the engine around 5% = more efficient, slower starts... basically: 3.4 w 3.43 fdr = 2000 RPM at 58mph 3.4 w 3.33 fdr = 2000 RPM at 62mph (approximation) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 You'll get better gas mileage, if you are concerned about it. Otherwise, swap up to the 3.73 gears and call it a day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 If your set on getting the original gearing, I have a tranny in my shed from a 93 3.4 GP, Ill give it to you for 50 bucks but I am not sure how close you are to NE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan_C Posted May 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 ON THE REAR OF THE CASE IS A TAG AND A STAMPED NUMBER. THE TAG IS TOWARDS THE RIGHT SIDE. THE STAMPED NUMBER IS ON A FLANGE RIGHT ABOVE THE PAN. GET BOTH AND POST ASAP. 3.4= 3.43 FDR 3.1= 3.33 FDR FYI You CAN use that transmission in your car(since you are OBD 1), but you'd overdrive the engine around 5% = more efficient, slower starts... basically: 3.4 w 3.43 fdr = 2000 RPM at 58mph 3.4 w 3.33 fdr = 2000 RPM at 62mph (approximation) Thanks, I - forwarded your information to my mechanic who double-checked and agrees with your conclusion. Decoding of the tag says it's 3.33 gears, which is fine by me - I don't really beat on the car anyway - I already have a ton of personal wrench time in the car including an engine swap. I'll eventually get some help and rebuild the original powertrain and swap it back in, but for now I'll settle for running and moving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alec_b Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Even though it's OBD-1 isn't the computer going to be upset about the FDR change since it's a 4T60-e? If the PCM is looking for certain parameters from the 3.43 FDR one would think switching to a 3.33 would make it act goofy. But maybe it's just the OBD2 cars that are picky about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Yah I agree with Alec... but did you see my previous post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertISaar Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Even though it's OBD-1 isn't the computer going to be upset about the FDR change since it's a 4T60-e? If the PCM is looking for certain parameters from the 3.43 FDR one would think switching to a 3.33 would make it act goofy. But maybe it's just the OBD2 cars that are picky about that. the difference between 3.43 and 3.33 is so minimal, the PCM really wouldn't care or possibly notice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy K Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Even though it's OBD-1 isn't the computer going to be upset about the FDR change since it's a 4T60-e? If the PCM is looking for certain parameters from the 3.43 FDR one would think switching to a 3.33 would make it act goofy. But maybe it's just the OBD2 cars that are picky about that. OBD 2 is picky. Obd 1 doesn't care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertISaar Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 OBD 2 is picky. Obd 1 doesn't care. truth... you'd probably set TCC/tranny slip codes with OBD2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alec_b Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Man OBD1 is nice, I'm glad I have it I just wondered because the newer GM's will set incorrect ratio codes with the wrong FDR. That's what the N* guys have trouble with when they swap the 275 horse for the 300 horse engine sometimes. You have to switch the trans to the 3.71 or re-burn the PCM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertISaar Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 only the VERY late OBD1 PCMs check for that type of thing, but N* going from what, 3.11 to 3.71, yeah, that's quite a difference, 19.3% compared to the 3% difference of a 3.43 to 3.33. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan_C Posted May 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Yah I agree with Alec... but did you see my previous post? I saw it and appreciate the offer, but I'm in west Michigan and I barely had even resources to pick up the trans from 200 miles away - that's why I decided to go ahead and start the install: I can't afford another 400 mile round trip right now and the 8 hrs driving that it entails. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWeb80 Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 rebuilding a trans isn't hard. i did mine. just take your time, have a parts washer, an ASTG manual, take your time, some normal tools, and take your time and It's simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.