kaptnjack Posted August 2, 2009 Report Posted August 2, 2009 This might be considered as a general wbody post but there has been some stated differences in the wheel wells on the vets. I have a 93 vert and recently bought a set of 18 x 7.5 +40 wheels. I am currently running 16 x 7 +40 with 225/60/16 with no issues at all. this is just a cruiser and rides at stock height. I know I dont want the fronts poking out of the fender wells so a rounded shoulder/sidewall is desirable but still want the widest and tallest tire possible. At this point my best guess using all available tire/wheel calculators and physical measurements indicates a 235/50/18 which specs generally (depending on brand/style) as .7" taller and .4" wider and .2" closer to suspension and .2" extended outward. With the car at rest the larger dimensions appears to be a non issue. At full lock-to-lock also appears to be a non issue BUT...non of this is considering deflection and suspension compression. Any thoughts? Anybody Quote
jake91 Posted August 2, 2009 Report Posted August 2, 2009 on a cutlass i think you can do 235/45/18. but dont take my word for it Quote
GOT2B GM Posted August 2, 2009 Report Posted August 2, 2009 I've got 235-50-18's on my 92 Z34, factory tire size on the 06+ Impy / Monte SS's Quote
kaptnjack Posted August 2, 2009 Author Report Posted August 2, 2009 thanks so far. Got2b...I looked at your photo bucket but didnt see the 18's mounted on the front. You got any more pictures or feedback on any rubbing issues? Quote
swift13 Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 im running 225 55 17 on my vert and get a little rubbing in the front but that could be due to the inner fender trim being loose but im not sure, i know if i were to put 18s on it i would have to size down the tire and loose some side wall height for sure. Quote
kaptnjack Posted August 4, 2009 Author Report Posted August 4, 2009 225 60 16 stock 26.6 tall 8.9 wide 225 55 17 26.8 tall 8.9 wide 235 50 18 27.3 tall 9.3 wide I might be in trouble I hope keeping the same +40 offset will help Quote
GP4U2NV Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 I have 18s on my 93 GP 245/35/18 tires. Quote
Spectrum Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 I have 245/45/18's on my 97 Lumina. I'm assuming there's not much different between the cars... 245/45/18 is a pretty much accurate conversion from 225/60/16, so the speedo is right on. I also went from the stock 16x6.5 to 18x8 and I have no rubbing issues. Quote
GOT2B GM Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 thanks so far. Got2b...I looked at your photo bucket but didnt see the 18's mounted on the front. You got any more pictures or feedback on any rubbing issues? awaiting my spacers for the fronts to show up, then I'll post pics / feedback Quote
kuntzie Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 235/50/18s... lowered on eibachs.... the tires do come really close to the strut towers but do not rub.. this would be the same for any 1st gen w.... man i miss these rims Quote
jeremy Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 I have 245/45/18's on my 97 Lumina. I'm assuming there's not much different between the cars... 245/45/18 is a pretty much accurate conversion from 225/60/16, so the speedo is right on. I also went from the stock 16x6.5 to 18x8 and I have no rubbing issues. x2 on the 245/45/18s Quote
kaptnjack Posted August 5, 2009 Author Report Posted August 5, 2009 Ok....I bit the bullet today and bought a set of 235/50/18 Falken ZE912's. I only was able to get two mounted today..one front and one rear. So far ...so good. Fits nice under the front fender lip and doesnt poke out. No rubbing lock to lock. Drove it maybe a mile and experienced no unwanted issues. There is no way that a tire 1/4" taller would have fit this well. I have less than a 1/4" clearance at the rear plastic fender liner on turn in... thats really close on the driver side...I hope its the same on the passenger side. If the car has been hit or bent...this tire/wheel setup probably wouldnt work. If the offset was lower like even maybe a +38 or +36 I dont think it would work. The wheels are Sacchi S25 18x7.5, ET40 offset, 5.8 backspace, painted White. http://www.sacchiwheels.com/ 235 50 18 Falken ZE912 27.4 tall 9.5 wide Thanks for the monte pics.....looks really good! I think an inch or so lower in the rear would be an improvement on my vert too. I also think I need to space the rear wheels out 1/2" or so. Anybody use spacers on the rear? how thick? Need longer studs? When I get them all mounted and on I will post some pictures Quote
kaptnjack Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Posted August 6, 2009 Ok...got the fender wells and suspension blacked out today....on one side. Took a drill and set of wire wheels and brushed all the rust off the rotor caps and edges, and calipers. I gave everything a good thorough cleaning, taped everything up and applied four coats of silver and three coats of clear top coat. I installed a 8mm (5/16") spacer at the rear to push the wheel out a smudge. It made a noticible difference but another spacer that size might be better but would push the OEM lug studs. I would probably have to install longer studs to add another one....maybe not. I read seven full turns of the lug is sufficient. I am a little uncertain of the spacers. Only because the new wheels require the smaller tuner lugs...and thats a new thing for me to. My driving style is very moderate in this car...its a cruiser and 85% of the time is under 50mph. No hard cornering etc. I am going to give it a try and keep an eye on them. I Torqued the lugs to 105 ft lbs in a star pattern as usual and will recheck/torque each time I drive it for a while to be sure. When I get it all together I will get some pics up. Quote
kaptnjack Posted August 10, 2009 Author Report Posted August 10, 2009 Ok...had a little issue. I did have some rubbing on the right front when at first turn-in. Rubbed the bumper skirt. The car had a little front end damage when I bought it and I had to straighten it out a little and rehang the fender and a new bumper and support. I was able to loosen and adjust it out to get another 1/2" which matched the driver side perfectly. There is the slightest scffing of the first layer of paint on the inner fender at the rear of the well where it bulges out a little but not a problem...only happens at extreme lock to lock. I have made a hard test including speed bumps, loaded, turn in to driveways and business etc....no worries. I will say again...if your car isnt straight....this wheel/tire combo will be problematic. link below looks wierd but leads to a popup slideshow more pictures so I built an album at the bucket http://s990.photobucket.com/albums/af30/kaptnjack_photos/ Quote
CSI_MuNkY Posted August 10, 2009 Report Posted August 10, 2009 Ok...had a little issue. I did have some rubbing on the right front when at first turn-in. Rubbed the bumper skirt. The car had a little front end damage when I bought it and I had to straighten it out a little and rehang the fender and a new bumper and support. I was able to loosen and adjust it out to get another 1/2" which matched the driver side perfectly. There is the slightest scffing of the first layer of paint on the inner fender at the rear well wwhere it bulges out a little but not a problem...only happens at extreme lock to lock. more pictures so I built an album at the bucket http://s990.photobucket.com/albums/af30/kaptnjack_photos/ I actually really like those wheels! Nice choice! Jamie Quote
kaptnjack Posted August 10, 2009 Author Report Posted August 10, 2009 thanks.... I like the ET40+ offset...sets the wheel nicely inside the fender lip...looks very put together to me. spacing the rear wheels out really brought it together and gave it a good stance. Quote
arizlang Posted August 14, 2009 Report Posted August 14, 2009 FYI I'm running 225/35-20 and have no issues and I'm actually moving up to 245/40-20's soon Quote
kaptnjack Posted August 14, 2009 Author Report Posted August 14, 2009 my setup: 235/50/18 27.3 tall 9.3 wide +40 offset You said you run: 225/35/20 26.2 tall 8.9 wide probably a +35 offset so there is no problem there You want to go to: 245/40/20 27.7 tall 9.6 wide +35 offset Without a doubt....those would rub on my car. They will mount ok, you could actually mount a tire 28.1 tall without hitting the spring mount but would rub the inner fender at rear and front bumber skirt at turn in.....I think. Be careful and let me know if you are successful. Quote
GnatGoSplat Posted August 24, 2009 Report Posted August 24, 2009 I would have gone 235/45R18. The sidewall doesn't look quite as fat and don't rub at all. I know some 3rd gen W's use 235/50's, but they also have a taller body. The shorter, slimmer body on the 1st gens looks more proportionate with slightly smaller overall wheel diameter. For 20", 245/35R20 is the closest +4 upgrade to the original 225/60R16s. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.