ManicMechanic Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 ...but something seems wonky about this car. http://www.texassalvagepools.com/index.php?fuseaction=car.view&carid=1125567 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP1138 Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Def. a '94. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegasm Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 I'd say '96. But i'm not very fluent in < 2nd gens either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManicMechanic Posted August 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 VIN says '93. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP1138 Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Hmm. Maybe it's a '93.5 - you can't look up the date of manufacture, can you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegasm Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 That steering wheel with those controls were used all the way back in '93? I didn't think they used them until '95-'96. Maybe an interior swap? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottster Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 That steering wheel with those controls were used all the way back in '93? I didn't think they used them until '95-'96. Maybe an interior swap? If you could see the seat belt tethers on the top of the door you could tell if it was an interior swap. I've noticed the Gen1.5s to have them mounted an inch or two lower than the earlier models, for shorter drivers. I know broads always complain the belts are choking them in my car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runt Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 If it's a '93, it was made LATE in the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSI_MuNkY Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Why would anyone do an interior swap and not include the HUD? go through all that work just to leave out the best part? When was the first year for 2nd gear start? I guess just because the button is there doesn't mean it works. Front seats appear to be pre-94, rear has head rests (buckets?), rear deck over the speakers is pre 94 as well. Jamie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP1138 Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Why would anyone do an interior swap and not include the HUD? go through all that work just to leave out the best part? When was the first year for 2nd gear start? I guess just because the button is there doesn't mean it works. Front seats appear to be pre-94, rear has head rests (buckets?), rear deck over the speakers is pre 94 as well. Jamie Most 4T60E's got Second Gear Start. On the older cars it was a switch on the console. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BXX Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 http://www.texassalvagepools.com/index.php?fuseaction=car.view&carid=1129009&bymake=0 half decent I-Series Cutty?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 If it's a '93, it was made LATE in the year. x2.....I've never seen a '93 with that interior.....I would bet on '94 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euro Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 94 for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Moff Joseph Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 The interior looks like 94+, but I thought that the front end on the car in question was stopped at the end of the 93 model year... And since when did GP SEs get 3.4s?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwmin Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 The interior looks like 94+, but I thought that the front end on the car in question was stopped at the end of the 93 model year... And since when did GP SEs get 3.4s?? you could always get an SE w/ a 3.4 and always get a BYP also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 you could always get an SE w/ a 3.4 and always get a BYP also yep.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euro Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 like this... TA DA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP1138 Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 The interior looks like 94+, but I thought that the front end on the car in question was stopped at the end of the 93 model year... Kevin (DiscoStudd) had a BYP '95 coupe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShockTherapy Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 email the guy for a pic of the RPO tag... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo231 Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 I agree with the 94+ statement, as 93's didn't get airbags and had a much different instrument/radio/shifter cluster. If you want 93 interior pictures, I can rehost mine, but I took them down when I sold my car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Addicted2bass Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 Looks just like the interior in my 96. I know that 96 was the only year that all GPs came with the B4U. Ugly color combo on that car to. It should have a darker colored interior. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.