Granted, I am not fluent in GPs...

[ManicMechanic]

...but something seems wonky about this car.

 

http://www.texassalvagepools.com/index.php?fuseaction=car.view&carid=1125567

 

 

[GP1138]

Def. a '94.

[stevegasm]

I'd say '96. But i'm not very fluent in < 2nd gens either.

[ManicMechanic]

VIN says '93.

[GP1138]

Hmm. Maybe it's a '93.5 - you can't look up the date of manufacture, can you?

[stevegasm]

That steering wheel with those controls were used all the way back in '93? I didn't think they used them until '95-'96. Maybe an interior swap?

[Scottster]

That steering wheel with those controls were used all the way back in '93? I didn't think they used them until '95-'96. Maybe an interior swap?

 

If you could see the seat belt tethers on the top of the door you could tell if it was an interior swap. I've noticed the Gen1.5s to have them mounted an inch or two lower than the earlier models, for shorter drivers. I know broads always complain the belts are choking them in my car.

[runt]

If it's a '93, it was made LATE in the year.

[CSI_MuNkY]

Why would anyone do an interior swap and not include the HUD? go through all that work just to leave out the best part?

 

When was the first year for 2nd gear start? I guess just because the button is there doesn't mean it works.

 

Front seats appear to be pre-94, rear has head rests (buckets?), rear deck over the speakers is pre 94 as well.

 

 

Jamie

[GP1138]

Why would anyone do an interior swap and not include the HUD? go through all that work just to leave out the best part?

 

When was the first year for 2nd gear start? I guess just because the button is there doesn't mean it works.

 

Front seats appear to be pre-94, rear has head rests (buckets?), rear deck over the speakers is pre 94 as well.

 

 

Jamie

 

Most 4T60E's got Second Gear Start. On the older cars it was a switch on the console.

[BXX]

http://www.texassalvagepools.com/index.php?fuseaction=car.view&carid=1129009&bymake=0

 

 

half decent I-Series Cutty??

[jeremy]

If it's a '93, it was made LATE in the year.

 

x2.....I've never seen a '93 with that interior.....I would bet on '94

[Euro]

94 for sure.

[Grand Moff Joseph]

The interior looks like 94+, but I thought that the front end on the car in question was stopped at the end of the 93 model year...

 

And since when did GP SEs get 3.4s??

[pwmin]

The interior looks like 94+, but I thought that the front end on the car in question was stopped at the end of the 93 model year...

 

And since when did GP SEs get 3.4s??

you could always get an SE w/ a 3.4 and always get a BYP also

[jeremy]

you could always get an SE w/ a 3.4 and always get a BYP also

 

yep....

[Euro]

like this... TA DA!

 

[GP1138]

The interior looks like 94+, but I thought that the front end on the car in question was stopped at the end of the 93 model year...

 

Kevin (DiscoStudd) had a BYP '95 coupe.

[ShockTherapy]

email the guy for a pic of the RPO tag...

[Turbo231]

I agree with the 94+ statement, as 93's didn't get airbags and had a much different instrument/radio/shifter cluster. If you want 93 interior pictures, I can rehost mine, but I took them down when I sold my car.

[Addicted2bass]

Looks just like the interior in my 96. I know that 96 was the only year that all GPs came with the B4U. Ugly color combo on that car to. It should have a darker colored interior.