what can be used

[pwmin]

at the least, youre going to want to do the 3400/big bore 3100 intake swap

[FordBoy]

i was thinking 30 over

is the 3500/3100 intake a mpfi?

[pwmin]

i dont think you can easily use a 3500 or 3900 intake manifold on an older 60*

 

SFI

 

 

http://www.3400swap.com/faq.html

 

[FordBoy]

if not i could use a 3100 or a 3400 top end

 

 

 

i think?

[pwmin]

thats what i'm saying. 2.8 (3.1 after you bore and stroke it) with 3500 heads and LIM with 3400 UIM (the parts listed on the previous 60*V6 link)

 

http://www.w-body.com/forum/index.php/topic,54992.0.html

 

[slick]

if not i could use a 3100 or a 3400 top end

 

 

 

i think?

 

Only if you swap over the heads as well. You will need custom length pushrods, and a few various odds and ends that arn't normal.

[slick]

thats what i'm saying. 2.8 (3.1 after you bore and stroke it) with 3500 top end except for 3400 intake manifolds (the parts listed on the previous 60*V6 link)

 

http://www.w-body.com/forum/index.php/topic,54992.0.html

 

 

Keep the 2.8 crank. It'll rev a bit quicker.

[pwmin]

thats what i'm saying. 2.8 (3.1 after you bore and stroke it) with 3500 top end except for 3400 intake manifolds (the parts listed on the previous 60*V6 link)

 

http://www.w-body.com/forum/index.php/topic,54992.0.html

 

 

Keep the 2.8 crank. It'll rev a bit quicker.

 

true. im just starting to rattle w/o thinking so i better stop

[FordBoy]

thats what i'm saying. 2.8 (3.1 after you bore and stroke it) with 3500 top end except for 3400 intake manifolds (the parts listed on the previous 60*V6 link)

 

http://www.w-body.com/forum/index.php/topic,54992.0.html

 

 

Keep the 2.8 crank. It'll rev a bit quicker.

 

true. im just starting to rattle w/o thinking so i better stop

no i like the imput

[Andrew]

 

 

thats right. it says 383 hp 2.8 !!!!!

[Euro]

pic doesn't work!

[FordBoy]

 

 

thats right. it says 383 hp 2.8 !!!!!

pic no work

really almost 400ph on a 2.8

[digitaloutsider]

It barely resembles a 2.8.

[Andrew]

the pic works for me, but here it is again.

 

[Euro]

a Twin Turbo 2.8........holy shit.

[PsiBer]

oooooook... I am doin this from memory cuz I looked and can't find this old book detailing factory build up of engines including a 2.8. one of the things I do remeber is the oiling system was designed with 7000rpm in mind. in the book they were going for a certian class limiting engines to under 3.0L the final result was an n/a 225hp. a competition block was used w/ 91mm bore and stock 2.8L crank extesive work was done on this engine so that it could see sustained high rpms all parts were from the GM parts bin... in that same bin are some racing pistons with 12.5:1 compresion ratio in std./+.5mm/+1mm overbore... I know you said you want to use the 2.8 but I have to say the new high feature 60* V6s make my mouth water (aka droooool)!

[FordBoy]

i never said i didnt like the other 60* v6s i just dont want one in my cutlass

 

that twin turbo 2.8 is amazing i want it