Jump to content

so i drove a 95 supreme sl today and..


sclary18

Recommended Posts

IT SUCKS! no offense to anyone out there, but i absolutely HATED it.. the interior made me feel like i was drivin a monte carlo, it had the 3100 and had alot LESS power than mine, and it overall looked too new... nice on the outside, shitty on the inside.. i give it a 2 out of 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IT SUCKS! no offense to anyone out there, but i absolutely HATED it.. the interior made me feel like i was drivin a monte carlo, it had the 3100 and had alot LESS power than mine, and it overall looked too new... nice on the outside, shitty on the inside.. i give it a 2 out of 5

 

Don't you have a 3100 as well? Could have just been out of tune as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you have the 3.4, thats a HUGE downgrade to the 3100 :lol: And even a bad running 3100 is a downgrade from a 3100.

 

Honestly the only thing I dont like about the interior of my car is the IP carrier is broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you have the 3.4, thats a HUGE downgrade to the 3100 :lol: And even a bad running 3100 is a downgrade from a 3100.

 

Honestly the only thing I dont like about the interior of my car is the IP carrier is broken.

 

He doesn't it's the 3.1, just checked another thread. And I agree with Jeremy, something must have been wrong with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, it just seemed like it had less power.. and also when i saw the pics of the 95 vert the interior looked really nice, but when i saw it in person i was like uhhhh, its too new.. and also.. it really just the interior that throws it off, i have the smaller no air bag steering wheel which makes it drive different, and also my car feels alot heavier and more old skool.. also with his.. i think its just cause when i hit the gas the chassis wasnt as strong like the vert..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm yeah. Deffinatly something wrong when a 3.1 owner says the 3100 has less power! :lol:

 

:werd:

 

x 100

 

My below average (IMO) running 3100 still managed to beat Q-ball's 92 GP 3.1 considerably...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The older interiors are cooler. But they are just too flimsy, rattley, and shakey. If I were to get another one it would be '95+ in blue or maroon. I'd retrofit some AQ9s, rear buckets and a GP HUD, just like I did to the '94...

 

I'd also talk to Dan ( stockgp ) about how he got the digi UB3 into his '95 interior. Cant get much better than that. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually can't decide, but the older GP interiors seem so much cheaper now that I have the newer interior. I actually prefer the 97+ and 04+ dashes myself.

 

Yeah, I'm the same way too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

get used to it, cause bland interiors will be around for a long time :lol: more unique interiors left GM around 1994, but what can ya do, other than grin and bear it. Thats what I did. FTR I do like the newer restyled interior too, but I always will like the original style. And just think, GM carried that general look over in the GP, analog odometer and all, till like 2003 :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interior is my Lumina sucks donkey balls so I dunno what you guys are whining about lol well with your rich style Cuttys and Regals and etc!! lol

Meh, the interior in the Regal isn't that much nicer than the Lumina Its the next base looking interior :lol: IMO the cutlasses have much nicer interiors that the Regals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...