Jump to content

DOHC 3.4 is or is not an interferance motor????


TGPilot

Recommended Posts

So is it or isn't it an interferance motor? I have seen so many posts going both ways it is annoying! Either it is or isn't....I need to know please! :willynilly: :wink: :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

91-95 Non-Interference

 

96-97 Interference

 

But, I have heard of both (91-95) hitting the heads and (96-97) not hitting the the heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

91-95 Non-Interference

 

96-97 Interference

 

But, I have heard of both (91-95) hitting the heads and (96-97) not hitting the the heads.

 

That is what I had thought. And that is the problem...mixed statements of valvetrain contact in either. CRAP!

 

Why can't it be SIMPLE! You damned LQ1 lovers! :wink: :lol:

 

I have a line on a possible cheap 3.4 car and if it is non-interferance I should do pretty good on the return.

 

Alright..thanks guys :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

best question to ask about it is when the timing belt broke, say they tell you "well i was passing someone on the highway" and that means they were prolly in a higher rpm range so greater change of damage. or "i was sitting at a redlight" and that would indicate probably no damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...