mihela816 Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 A lo quad, with a 3 speed and 2.84 final drive would struggle to beat a 4 speed 3.1 with a 3.33 final drive. Tey're good motors, but not THAT good. Also good luck testing it anyway, the lo quad cutlasses are almost nonexistently rare. Quote
Canada Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 I'll bet they got the 3.61....every other early 90s GM 5 speed did, other than LQ1s, which had 3.67. Who knows what 1-5 was....they changed every year, other than in 92-94. Quote
dbtk2 Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 A lo quad, with a 3 speed and 2.84 final drive would struggle to beat a 4 speed 3.1 with a 3.33 final drive. Tey're good motors, but not THAT good. Also good luck testing it anyway, the lo quad cutlasses are almost nonexistently rare. Yeah, but if your talking about engine vs. engine, the quad 4 wins. Obviously with a much worse drivetrain the quad loses any advantage it might have. Quote
havikx Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 which w's had the 3.5?.. *cough* glad to see the 3.4dohc on top *cough* Quote
CuttySup Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 Third. 1. 3.4 DOHC 2. 3800 Series II 3. 3800 Series I 4. 3400 SFI 5. 3100 SFI 6. 3.1 MPFI I --??think??-- I got that right? What W-body had the 3400? Quote
Supreme Cutlass Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 A few cutlass's actually for dead certainty. I know my 92 sedan had the option of a 3400, it was just rare Quote
slick Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 A few cutlass's actually for dead certainty. I know my 92 sedan had the option of a 3400, it was just rare You are mistaken for the 3.4 DOHC. The 3400 was offered in the 2nd gen Impala's and Monte's. Quote
excelsior Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 how is the q4 slower then the 2.8? 30 more hp, only 5 less torque, lighter car am i missing something(i know less usable powerband but still) :? :? Quote
mihela816 Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 New List: 1. 3.4 DOHC 2. 3800 SII 3. 3.5 Shortstar 4. 3400 SFI 5. Quad 4 DOHC- HI output 6. 3800 7. 3100 SFI 8. 3.1 MPFI 9. Quad 4 DOHC-LO output 10. 2.8 MPFI 11. 2.2 MPFI 12. 2.5 Iron Duke 13. Empty Engine Bay Read the list again. the Quad is definitely faster than a 2.8. Quote
Aaron Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 I personally think a S* can take a 3800II, and would like to see the race. Quote
mihela816 Posted July 15, 2005 Report Posted July 15, 2005 I had absolutely no clue where to stick that engine. Quote
Brian P Posted July 16, 2005 Report Posted July 16, 2005 I personally think a S* can take a 3800II, and would like to see the race. Doing a quick check on MSN: '98 Intrigue: 195hp/230 Tq (3.8 II) 0-60: 8.13 1/4: 16.29 @ 87.50 '99 Intrigue: 215hp/230 tq S* 0-60: 6.99 1/4: 15.41 @ 93.00 Quote
Aaron Posted July 16, 2005 Report Posted July 16, 2005 Thanks, looks as if I was right 8) Also, the Intrigue has a faster 0-60 than the 3.4l DOHC, and arguably a faster 1/4mi. Quote
THe_DeTAiL3R Posted July 16, 2005 Report Posted July 16, 2005 Thanks, looks as if I was right 8) Also, the Intrigue has a faster 0-60 than the 3.4l DOHC, and arguably a faster 1/4mi. Don't forget it's maybe a bit heavier than a Lumi too.. Quote
patgizz Posted July 16, 2005 Report Posted July 16, 2005 ok, i have NEVER seen a 2.2 in a w, ever, name one person on this board with one, or a pic of a lumina or what ever with that motor in it, it wasnt a w-body motor, the only 4bangers in w's were the 2.5 and 2.3, thats it http://www.w-body.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31175 EDIT:ok thats insane, kbb says only the 93 had the 2.2, why tho, thats crazyness, iv never in my life seen, or even herd of be4 now of a lumina w/ the 2.2 i got my chime module out of a 93 with a 2.2 Quote
Aaron Posted July 16, 2005 Report Posted July 16, 2005 Thanks, looks as if I was right 8) Also, the Intrigue has a faster 0-60 than the 3.4l DOHC, and arguably a faster 1/4mi. Don't forget it's maybe a bit heavier than a Lumi too.. It is probably really close, maybe a little heavier, but I wouldn't think by much. Quote
88Regal Limited Posted July 17, 2005 Report Posted July 17, 2005 What W-body had the 3400? http://w-body.com/motors Can any1 read!?!?! edit: newer GP's. Quote
Prospeeder Posted July 17, 2005 Report Posted July 17, 2005 well for one, that doesnt even list the 3400, but its in the Impalas, and Monte carlos i think Quote
CuttySup Posted July 17, 2005 Report Posted July 17, 2005 I dunno about the Iron Duke 4-tech being faster that the empty engine bay Quote
Prospeeder Posted July 17, 2005 Report Posted July 17, 2005 LOL, yea for real, this dude on GAOC was like, oh my Iron duke GA i just got is hesitating, i posted, are u sure its hesitating, or is it really really slow, lol Quote
Brian P Posted July 17, 2005 Report Posted July 17, 2005 What W-body had the 3400? http://w-body.com/motors Can any1 read!?!?! edit: newer GP's. So not only can they not read, but YOU can't read apparantly. GP's never got the 3400. Quote
Prospeeder Posted July 17, 2005 Report Posted July 17, 2005 LOL, thats halarious, yea, GPs only got the 2.3, 2.8, 3.1, 3100, 3.4, 3800, and 5.3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.